THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

by Lawrence W. Althouse

 

IS THERE

 A DIFFERENCE?

 

April 6, 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Daniel 1.

Devotional Reading:

Psalms 141:1-4.

 

There are ballooning controversies in several European nations with growing populations of Islamic peoples. Some object vigorously to Moslems who insist on wearing distinctive Islamic clothing in schools and places of business, especially the mandating of veils for Islamic women. This could also easily become a conflict in our own country.

I understand, if not necessarily agree with, those wanting to preserve a visible            religious identity. I also understand those who are offended by it in a nation where, with a few exceptions---Hasidic Jews, Amish and Mennonites---people of different religious persuasions are generally unidentifiable by their appearances. Walk down any street in the USA and it is very unlikely that you will be able to distinguish between Christians and non-Christians, between Methodists and Presbyterians, or even between agnostics and atheists.

RECOGNIZING CHRISTIANS

An obituary in our newspaper lauded a woman who had spent many years in the outreach ministry of her church. When I mentioned this to her neighbor, he remarked: “I never knew that. she was involved in any church.” In a sense this is a tragic commentary on a society in which neighbors have no idea who shares with them a faith in Jesus Christ.

There were two critical times in Israel’s history. The first of these was during the 7th century B.C. when the Jews were captives in Babylon. The second time was the 2nd century when Israel was under the oppressive rule of the Greek king Antiochus Epiphanes. He was possessed of two ambitions: (1) to dominate Egypt, and (2) to Hellenize (or make Grecian) the culture of the entire Middle East. As one scholar puts it, “The Jews stood astride his path to both goals.” He used stark methods to obliterate the Jewish culture: making it a capital offense to circumcise baby boys, to own s copy of the Jewish Law, or to keep the Sabbath. On December 25, 168 B.C. he desecrated the Jewish temple with the compulsory worship of the Greek god Zeus. But the more ruthless he was, the more the Jews resisted him and eventually revolted under the leadership of the Macabees. On December 25, 165 B.C. the Temple was reconsecrated, and for a time Jews would rule themselves.

It was during this cataclysmic period that Daniel was written. For fear of Antiochus, the writer set the book four centuries earlier in the period of the Babylonian captivity, when Nebuchadnezzar was the all-powerful ruler. He says “Nebuchadnezzar,” but he expects the reader to think “Antiochus.” When speaking of the threat to Jewish identity under Babylonian rule, he is challenging his readers to remain faithful Jews in the days of the Geek tyrant.

A GOOD DEAL?

When the Babylonians conquered a people, it was customary to enlist in their service the brightest and best of their foes. They were well treated and in return they were given new names and expected to become Babylonians in culture, language and worship the god Marduk. It seemed a great deal, but Daniel knew it would alienate himself from the God of Israel.

Therefore, he refused to eat the rich food that the king had ordered. So this is all about food? No, the food is simply symbolic of the covenant relationship between God and his people. To eat food forbidden by Jewish law would stand as outright disloyalty to Israel’s God. Certainly the Babylonians must have wondered why the Jews were standing firm over dietary laws. But the dietary laws were only outward symbols of a much deeper commitment.

Our purpose in studying Daniel 1, however, is not to view thins ancient conflict for its own sake, but for our own times as well. Are we mostly defined by our American culture or our Christian faith? What distinguishes us from the rest of our society? And, who, besides the members of your church, recognize that you are a follower of Jesus Christ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

by Lawrence W. Althouse

 

PROMISE OF

‘ANOTHER’

 

April 13, 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Daniel 3

Devotional Reading:

Psalms 121.

 

        The Book of Daniel is composed of six stories and four dream-visions. Daniel 3 is the first of the six stories. Although they are set in the time of the 6th century B.C. Babylonian captivity, the author is really writing about his own time, the 2nd century B.C. during the brutal reign of Antiochus Epiphanes, the Hellenist (Greek) king. Perhaps our times, too! 

        In this round-about-way, the writer is challenging his readers to resist the seductive Hellenist culture that is undermining the Jewish religion---those who are seduced by the superficial attractions of Greek culture, and also those intimidated by the ruthlessness of Hellenist power. The world of Daniel is a model for our own world today.

        Nebuchadnezzar is  powerful man and his faith is in the threat of physical force: “You are commanded , O peoples, nations, and languages that… you are to fall down and worship the golden image that King Nebuchadnezzar has set up, and whoever does not…shall immediately be cast into a burning, fiery furnace”! (Daniel 3:3).

A DIFFERENT WAY

Almost two hundred years after the rule of the Hellenists, Jesus came offering and urging a strikingly different way to live in the world. He proclaimed the kingdom of God, a power not of physical force but spiritual persuasion. Jesus blessed “the peacemakers” (Mt. 5:9), condemned killing and the anger that engenders it (Mt. 5:21, 22), as well as the “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” mentality that leaves many blind and toothless (Mt. 5:38-42).

        Yet, while billions of people around the world have made Christianity the world’s most numerous faith, how many Christians have ever believed that the teachings of Christ are practical for life in this world? We spend our energy, not in living them, but arguing about them. In reality, many of us embrace, not the way of Jesus, but the way of the world that still pretty much follows the eye-for-an-eye principle. Often it is fear of physical force, not respect for love that determines how and why we live. It is our culture that instructs us, not the gospel.

What Daniel admires in these martyrs is their attitude in the face of horrible deaths. Their God is able to deliver them, but if he does not, they will not change their faith to save their lives, just as many of us will not change our culture to save our souls. “But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods or worship toe golden image which you have set up” (3:18). They will accept martyrdom rather than sink to apostasy.

‘ANOTHER’ WITH US

Let us be careful not to forget that life is full of consequences, even in spite of and because of faith. And we must not let this story beguile us into thinking that our loyalty to God will keep adversity and suffering away. In this case and by some reason of providence known only to God, the three men were saved from a terrible death. But there have been innumerable saints who have paid terrible consequences for their faith.

When I am confronted by danger or some threatening situation, I always pray for God’s help. Sometimes I am spared that danger, while other times the answer to my prayer is the assurance that I will not be alone in my trial. My security is not in the certainty of escape, but in God’s presence to bring my through it with faith intact.

When Nebuchadnezzar looked at the fiery furnace his power had created, he was shocked: “But I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they are not hurt; and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods.” The price of faith is an unswerving loyalty to God and coming with it is the assurance that in whatever circumstance we find ourselves, there is another to stand with us. 

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

by Lawrence W. Althouse

 

FAITH-BASED

VULNERABILITY

 

April 20, 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Daniel 6.

Devotional Reading:

Psalms 119:57-64.

 

        The story of Daniel in the lions’ den is one of many Bible “success” stories: Noah’s ark outlasts the flood, Isaac is spared the sacrificial knife, little David defeats gigantic Goliath, and so forth. In fact, I can think of only one story in the Bible in which a person of faith and God’s favor experiences failure instead of success: Jesus on the cross of Calvary.

        Of course, Jesus on the cross was a failure---at least in the eyes of society---but Jesus resurrected from death and the tomb is a success story of the highest kind. The story of Jesus was initial or short-term failure vs. ultimate or long-term success. Christian discipleship does not keep us from the former, but it does guarantee us the latter. Unfortunately, it is all so easy to think and act only in terms of immediate success---of Daniel uneaten by the lions and freed alive and whole from the pit, of Jesus being saved at the last moment from crucifixion.

ULTIMATE RESULTS

The problem for us is that, when we put short-term success ahead of long-term vindication, we are liable to be upset and even resentful against God when we experience initial failure: “What’s the point of keeping the faith if God isn’t going to save my marriage?” “Why should I pray for the sick if there’s no assurance they all will be healed ““I asked for a sign, but I didn’t get one.” ”I asked for peace, but instead we went to war again?” “Why should I try to follow Jesus if the way leads to a cross?”

        Personally, I never hesitate to offer intercessory prayer for people “dangerously” even “hopelessly” ill, injured or in trouble. Despite grim prognoses, some of these people will be healed and helped, while it would seem that others have not. For those who recover, I celebrate. And of those who do not, I try to understand that God has answered my prayers, although not in the way I had intended. I have even learned that we need to pray, not only to help people recover, but also to help people die. I pray, not so much to tell God what to do, let alone how to do it, but that I join Him in wanting the best possible result within the confines of his will.

        The great success in the events of Daniel 6 was not his release unharmed from the lion’s den, but his refusal to turn his back on the Lord.: “When Daniel knew that the document had been signed, he went to his house where her had windows in his upper chamber toward Jerusalem; and he got down upon his knees three times a day and prayed and gave thanks before his God, as he had done previously” (6:10). Presumably, Daniel prayed to escape from this grave crisis, but the writer tells us that he also “gave thanks.” He is facing a terrible ordeal that will surely cost his life much pain and suffering, but he still gives thanks. This is a success considerably greater than being saved from the lion’s den.

FALSE SUCCESS

Daniel 6 begins with a success story that is not about true success. “It pleased Darius to set over the kingdom a hundred and twenty satraps…and over them three presidents. Of whom Daniel was one…Then this Daniel became distinguished above all the other presidents and satraps, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king planned to set him over the whole kingdom.”  Of course, this was short-term success and was to be followed soon by crisis: “Then the presidents and the satraps sought to find a ground for complaint against Daniel with regard to the kingdom…We shall not find any ground for complaint against this Daniel unless we find it in connection with the law of his God.”” (6:4).

        His loyalty to God was Daniel’s Achilles Heel because he was predictable. They didn’t have to guess what he would do when confronted with their charges, for they knew he would not be swayed. Yes, that was his vulnerability, as it should be ours, but it is only superficially vulnerable. It was really his greatest asset and success.

Is it yours? 

       

 

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

by Lawrence W. Althouse

 

FOR GOD’S SAKE

 

April 27, 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Daniel 9

Devotional Reading:

Psalms 130.

 

        When I was a child, the God presented in my church experience was an angry, vengeful God. Perhaps this was because the God of whom I thought and to whom I talked was really so different from the God presented in lessons and sermons on Sundays. As I came to read more and more of the New Testament and the Jesus who came to reveal God to us, I wondered why the picture of God was so one-sided, so founded upon a God of judgment instead of the God of love and mercy revealed in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.

        Sometime during the past decades, however, has been a change in that perception of God. The most persistent concept today is a God of love and mercy, so that now in most mainline churches it appears that the God of judgment has been largely forgotten. Is it possible that we have swung from one extreme to another? Must we choose between these two perceptions, or do we need to incorporate both images into our understanding of God?

        In Daniel 9 we see Daniel praying, “O Lord, the great and terrible God, who keepest covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments” (9:4).  In one sentence of prayer, Daniel acknowledges that God is both “great and terrible” and

“steadfast love.” Both these elements are evident in the God of Jesus, who began his ministry, proclaiming, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (MT. 4:17). The way out of sin and selfishness is repentance, the result of which is the love and salvation of God.

REPENTANCE IS UNPATRIOTIC1

        The people of Israel to whom Daniel was appealing needed the message coming from Daniel, even if they didn’t like it. Over the centuries they had drifted further and further away from God, acknowledging him as their tribal god, but ignoring both his commandments and his prophets. When the prophets had come to them imploring them to return to God and uphold the covenant, they couldn’t conceive of a need to repent.

People, then and now, don’t like prophets because they always focus on what is wrong with our societies. We do not like to be told there is something wrong, nor do we want to be told to repent. Repentance is unpatriotic! (but sometimes, so is God!).

        Daniel has been reading the prophecies of Jeremiah and, perceiving that Jeremiah’s prophecies are just as authoritative for the Jews of his day as in the day they were written, he responds with an anguished prayer: “…we have sinned and done wrong and acted wickedly and rebelled, turning aside from thy commandments and ordinances; we have not listened to thy servants the , who spoke in our name to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people of the land” (Daniel 9:5,6).

REPENTANCE REQUIRED

         Today, more than 20 centuries since they were written, we can read those words with detached indifference, because we cannot see that we or our nation need to repent. Of course not: that’s what the people in Jeremiah’s day thought, and the people in Daniel’s day------------and the people in our day? Surely, our God of love and grace doesn’t want that kind of prayer from us! Surely, he does!

        I believe we live in the greatest country in the world. But it is not the kingdom of God. In fact, it has not yet fulfilled its own purpose and destiny. We’ve come along way, but the ideals with which we began constrain us to keep moving upward and onward Our United States were not won nor founded by those who were satisfied with the way things were.

As Christians we have a responsibility under God to join in working to fulfill the greatest experiment in government that the world has known. And that will require repentance from time to time to a God who demands of us justice, righteousness and compassion and offers us mercy and salvation. .