THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

By Lawrence W. Althouse

 

A REVOLUTIONARY

NAMED ‘MARY’

 

December 7. 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Luke 1:26-38, 46-55.

Devotional Reading:

1 Samuel 2:1-10.

 

        One of the pitfalls into which we may stumble is the habit of transforming significant witnesses to Christ into what we want them to be, rather than as what the scriptures present them to be. This is particularly true of Mary, the mother of Jesus. As painted in pictures, sculpted in statuary and proclaimed in prose and poetry, Mary is depicted as a woman so filled with the spirit of God that she soars far above mere human beings---an accurate depiction, but not the complete image of Mary.

That is why Luke is so important to us: it helps us see Mary in another light that is all too often neglected. In this passage we call “The Magnificat,” the tender, righteous virgin appears as Mary the ecstatic revolutionary prophet and we cannot, must not hear her without recognizing what a piercing challenge she presents to her world and to ours.

MAGNIFYING THE LORD

            Although the words of “The Magnificat” are uniquely Mary’s own, there is a tone in them that is reminiscent of the fiery proclamations of another seemingly insignificant woman: Hannah, the saintly mother of the “miracle” child who, one thousand years before the birth of Jesus, became Samuel the Prophet of God. In 1 Samuel 2:1-10, the humble Hannah ecstatically announces: “My heart exults in the Lord; my strength is exalted in the Lord” (2:1).  Mary begins much the same: “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Lk. 1:46,47).

                There is nothing all that revolutionary in either of those exclamations, but Hannah goes on to  exult: “The bows of the mighty are broken, but the feeble gird on strength…The Lord makes poor and makes rich; he brings low, he also exalts…He raises up the poor from the dust; he lifts the needy from the ash heap…He shall guard the feet of his faithful ones; but the wicked shall be cut off in darkness” (1 Sam. 2:4,7-9). The humble woman who by God’s grace bears a son in her old age, is suddenly a revolutionary! What God will do runs exactly contrary to popular values and opinion. She sees her society as God sees it and those who heard her must have shuddered.

        So it is with Mary. Inspired by God’s messenger, Mary is lifted out of herself and sees the kingdom of God that Hannah glimpsed and it is certainly not the world as it is: “…he has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts, he has put down the mighty from their thrones, and exalted those of low degree; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent empty away” (Lk. 2:51-53).

A WORLD UPSIDE-DOWN

 Luke doesn’t tell us who, beside Elizabeth, heard these words of Mary, but if there were others—neighbors, friends, passers-by—we may be certain that some of them were greatly incensed. Most of us do not like what revolutionaries say to us. We do not like to see our world turned upside-down! We don’t want anyone to tell us that there is something wrong about our way of life, our society, our nation, and our world. We want God to bless, but not judge us. And that means we really don’t want God!

In the Magnificat (named for the first word of the passage in Latin), the greatly blessed and humble Mary was lifted up in an ecstatic experience in which she revealed the mystery of what God was going to do in and with her: the birth of her child Jesus would bring both great blessing to his people and radical judgment. What Mary was for a moment, a revolutionary voice for God, Jesus would be throughout his life and ministry.

With the marvelous blessings that Jesus brought there would also be God’s judgment upon the proud and haughty oppressors of the lowly, because that is how the Lord is magnified!  He ignores the mighty and the proud and speaks through seemingly insignificant, though receptive and lowly people such as Hannah and Mary---and Jesus!

       

 

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

By Lawrence W. Althouse

 

OFTEN IN ERROR

 

December 14. 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Luke 1:5-24, 39-45.

Devotional Reading:

Isaiah7:10-14.

 

        Five people are mentioned in Luke 1:5-24, 39-45, only one of whom, King Herod, would have been regarded as important and well-known. Herod’s recognition rested upon the fear and hatred he elicited throughout the Mediterranean world. He was not so much famous, as infamous. 

The other four names, according to the standards of the day—and perhaps ours, too---would have been regarded as insignificant: Zechariah, Elizabeth, Mary and John. To be sure, Zechariah was a priest of the Jerusalem Temple, but there were probably 20,000 priests in those days, because every male descendent of Aaron was recognized as a priest (kohen in Hebrew: people with the surname “Cohen” today are believed to have come from Jewish priestly families.)

In fact, there were so many priests that they were divided into 24 divisions, 800 to 1,000 in each, and every division served in the temple one month every two years. Only a few priests were needed for this service, so lots were drawn and the possibilities of being chosen were very slim. Thus, when the turn came for Zechariah’s division and he won the privilege to officiate at the altar of incense, it was a rare and cherished honor for the priest---but not the populace as a whole.

BARREN ELIZABETH!

Zechariah’s wife was also from a priestly family, a highly desirable but not mandatory requirement for a priest. Nor would it likely be of any special interest that “they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.”  Much more likely to be noted was that “Elizabeth was barren, and both were advanced in years” (Lk.1:6, 7).

 It is difficult for us to appreciate just how humiliating childlessness was in those days, because we do not attach any particular judgment to a couple without children. But in that day it was held as a mark of God’s punishment and solely the wife’s fault, although the husband’s image was also thereby diminished. So strong was this view that bareness was a valid ground for a man to obtain a divorce.

Although this disdain of bareness was widely held among the people, this story is strong evidence against that view. Both Zechariah and Elizabeth were “righteous” and God was going to respond to their prayers by giving them a son---and not just any son, but John who would be known as “the Baptist.” (Other Bible stories with a similar theme: Abraham and Sarah to whom God gave a child, Isaac, in their old age and Manoah, to whom God gave Samson as a son.)

HUMAN PRECEPTS

                Similarly, it is really quite common for people, including Christians, to hold rigid religious beliefs that are contrary to the way God works in the world. We know better, but we often judge a person’s spiritual worth by their obvious material prosperity or lack of it. Like the “friends” of Job, we often wonder what some persons have done or not done in order to get themselves into difficulty.

 Throughout Christian history there have been imposed standards regarded as mandatory originating, not in the expressed will of God, but in the prejudices and imaginations of those who are often in error, but never in doubt. Earlier in my life that included dancing, attending the theater, playing cards, and so forth.

As Jesus is quoted in Matthew and Mark: “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men”   (Isaiah 29:13; Mt. 25:8,9; Mk. 7:6,7).

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

By Lawrence W. Althouse

 

THE ROAD

FROM BETHLEHEM

 

December 21. 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Luke 2:1-20.

Devotional Reading:

Psalms 107:1-15.

 

        My earliest Christmas memory is based upon an experience when I was four or five years old. It was a cold Christmas Eve and, for some reason that I didn’t know, we drove about five miles into the countryside to a church that was not our own. As we entered the candlelit church, a sense of great awe and mystery swept over me as I came into the presence of One whom later I would call “God.”

        Although I probably knew it was Christmas, I had little idea what it was all about. Nevertheless, when we left that church, I took something with me, something only vaguely remembered, but never forgotten: that night I was in the awesome presence of Something or Someone truly wonderful.

Most of my Christmases since then have been lit by that unquenchable memory. I regret that I never questioned my parents about it. A few times when I have returned to the place of my birth and youth, I have tried to find that church, but with no success. But, of course, neither the place nor the church are really important. It is what I took with me when the service was over---and still have!  

CHRISTMAS LET-DOWN?

        I know that, while Christmas is probably the most celebrated religious holiday in the world---although for many it has little or no religious meaning---it is probably the most disappointing holiday as well. This is because many have nothing to take with them when the celebration is over. Christmas without Christ cannot possibly fulfill our expectations.

We know the nativity story so well that we forget its revolutionary significance. Jesus was born to two “unimportant” people---“lower class” types. When they arrived in Bethlehem after a hard trip of eighty miles from Nazareth, there was no place for them in the paltry village inn. No one there was expecting them, nor did the locals have even a dim awareness of what was happening in their town.  The baby was born in a stable and lay in a manger.

Well, you say, at least the Holy Family was visited by a band of shepherds. But shepherds were among the lowest occupants of the social ladder. Long days and nights in the fields kept the shepherds from observing the finer points of law. They were despised by “good” Jews who scrupulously kept the law.

SHEPHERDS AND ANGELS

William Barclay tells us that there were two customs normally observed at the time of birth. Family, friends and neighbors would descend upon the house of the newborn to congratulate the parents. And, very often, local musicians would arrive to serenade the newborn and parents. But, when Jesus was born, there were lowly shepherds who visited the newborn Jesus and a heavenly choir of angels.

        Despite their low estate and rustic spirituality, it was the shepherds

who responded to the heavenly messengers and set off for Bethlehem. And because their hearts and minds were open that night they left the stable and took away something wonderful: “And when they saw it they made known the saying which had been told them concerning this child; and all who heard it wondered at what the shepherds told them” (27,18).They saw for themselves the Good News and, when their visit was over, they took it with them and shared it.

As important as it is to tread the way to Bethlehem, it is even more important that, when we have worshipped the Christ Child, we take the Good News with us on the road from Bethlehem and out into the world!

 

 

 

 

THE BIBLE SPEAKS

 

By Lawrence W. Althouse

 

WHAT SHALL

WE DO?

 

December 28. 2008

 

Background Scripture:

Luke 3:1-20.

Devotional Reading:

               Psalms 51:10-19

 

               Some might be tempted to skip over or rush through the first two verses of Luke 3. In case you haven’t noticed, Luke is very careful to set his narrative in an exact time-frame. In other words, he wants us to know that this is not just a once-upon-a-time tale taking place in never-never time.

                It is in the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar’s reign over the Roman Empire, during Pontius Pilate’s rule of Judea as Roman procurator, and Herod the Great the puppet-king and his two sons, Herod Antipas and Philip the Tetrarch. During this same period, the Jerusalem temple and its priests were controlled Annas, the High Priest, and his son-in-law, Caiaphas. About Lysanias, the tetrarch of Abilene, nothing is known today, although as a sub-ruler under Herod the Great he probably was not obscure in his own day.

                Now the irony is that, with the possible exception of Tiberius Caesar, none of these “important” names are known today to the average reader. In John’s day, however, the Baptist was virtually unknown to the recorders of human events. Today, the tables are turned and it is he who is recognized as “important.”

FITTING-IN

                     This is just one more example of how God upsets the human scheme of things, a none-too-gentle reminder that when the gospel was let loose in the world, it didn’t fit in nicely with the way things were. It was stone in the Roman sandal, an irritant in Jewish society and a scandal to the Hebrew religion. Those of who think that our society and faith are quite compatible do not understand either. The conflict between physical and spiritual power is not simply reconciled.

                So we must realize that the message of John the Baptist was not that of a “Prosperity with Jesus” evangelist. No one who ever heard John preach or prophesy came away saying, “That was a nice message.” John’s message was not meant to soothe, but to ruffle and disturb---and it did: You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?” (Lk. 3:7).

            Keep in mind he was talking to the average Jew, (like the average person who today identifies him or herself as “A Christian”), not the known and labeled sinners. I say that because Luke tells us these are the kind of people who thought of themselves as God’s devoted children: “…and do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father’; for I tell you, God is able to raise up children to Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire” (3:8,9). Getting right with God does not mean belonging to the right race, nation or group; it is a matter of bearing fruits that befit repentance.”

GOOD PEOPLE, REPENT!

                John is calling for repentance from the “good” religious people of his day---and ours—but what does “repentance” mean for “good” people? And “the multitudes asked him, ‘What then shall we do?’” When one lives by all or most of the rules, why do we need to repent? From what do we need repentance?

So John gives them a plain answer: “He who has two coats, let him share with him who has none; and he who has food, let him do likewise.” To the tax collectors he said, “Collect no more than is appointed to you” (3:10-13). There are some things in the Gospels hard to understand, but John’s answers are almost too understandable. (Take a lined tablet and number the lines “1” through “10.” At the top, write, “What Shall I Do?  God will suggest some answers!)

     Do any of us really have to ask that question?